Russia: Conscript Seeks Asylum in Georgia

Global Voices Online
Thursday, January 29, 2009


Aleksandr Glukhov, a 21-year-old Russian conscript, has asked for asylum in the Republic of Georgia to escape the "unbearable conditions" in the Russian army. One of Glukhov's media appearances took place as he was dining at a McDonald's restaurant in Tbilisi. Russian officials claim that Glukhov was captured by Georgian armed forces in South Ossetia, where he was performing his compulsory military service, and taken to the Georgian capital. Quite a few people in Russia seem to consider Glukhov "a traitor." Below are some of the reactions from the Russophone blogosphere.

LJ user shurigin:

[...] The defense ministry is currently [trying to figure out how all this could have happened]. To begin with, it turns out that this soldier is a conscript. How he got to South Ossetia, despite the order to staff military units with contract soldiers - no one can answer this question coherently.


LJ user introvertoff:

I was on the way home late at night yesterday. On a [bus], in addition to me, there was a bus driver, a couple of men and a couple of women, aged 50 to 60. The radio was playing the news:

"And, finally, metropolitan Kirill becomes the finalist of the "choose the patriarch" game," - the radio was saying something like this, only in a more formal style. [...] The bus filled with happy noise - women and men started a joyful discussion about how they worried, how they hoped, how they prayed. They are happy that the Church will now turn to the right path, etc.

And suddenly! They started talking about the news of the deserter Sergeant Glukhov on the radio. And the happy noise was replaced with angry cries - "How could he!", "A dirty deserter!", "He's exchanged his motherland for junk food!", "And he was under oath!", "Impale him, the dog, impale him!" Orthodox Christians, who were [wiping tears of joy] a minute ago, turned into bloodthirsty fanatics demanding punishment for a traitor! [...]


LJ user drugoi:

[...] He's not a traitor, of course. Just a fool, immature, a boy. He doesn't belong in the army, he should be making sand pies in a sandbox still.


LJ user mike67:

Maybe Glukhov deserves condemnation, but how to do it when you are weeping with laughter? [...]

When it turns out that a soldier has defected to the enemy because his unit didn't have a bath and the commander was cursing when orders weren't carried out... No one believes this. They are looking for politics, suspect pressure from the Georgian side. What pressure? Wake up: it's the same people who interpret a request to take out the garbage as an attempt on their human dignity. This is a free generation, [...], and they sure know about honor and dignity a lot more than we do.

[...]

No one is getting it: it's not politics, it's an infantile generation, raised on [...] an opportunity to take a loan for a plasma-panel display - or even a car - right after high school. [...] The idea that every person deserves the best [...] is spreading around the world like a virus. [...]


A note on the living conditions in the Russian army, by LJ user shabolovka38, in a comment to LJ user grazy-gunner's post:

[...] And one woman there says: Yes, the conditions are bad. They live in tents, heated by stoves.

And where are soldiers supposed to live? In a cottage?


LJ user budimir:

Aleksandr Glukhov: «I'm loving it!».

McDonald's has launched a creative [...] advertisement: a Russian soldier, unable to bear the hardships of service in South Ossetia, where they didn't feed him properly, deserts to the Georgian side and finds happiness there [...].


LJ user merjageko:

I wonder if Russia is going to send tanks to Georgia, to save Sergeant Glukhov? Because he's being tortured with McDonald's there...


LJ user neznaika-nalune asks:

Tell me, is an out-of-the-way McDonald's with peeling walls a new symbol of the "famed Georgian hospitality" and the "famous Georgian cuisine?"


LJ user taganay replies:

This kind of hospitality befits this kind of a defector.

Israel: A Russian Photojournalist's Notes

Global Voices Online
Thursday, January 22, 2009


Dmitry Kostyukov (LJ user kostyukov), a Russian photojournalist, is currently on assignment in Israel. In August 2008, he was covering the war in South Ossetia, and here is a 6-minute slideshow of the photos he took there:



Since he posted this selection on his blog while already in Israel, one of his readers asked an obvious question (RUS):

hapylliutejib:

Drawing some parallels [between the two conflicts] or is it just a sudden memory?


Kostyukov replied:

No hidden intent here, no subtext... everything is simpler. First, the war reminded me of the war (although I never really forget about it), and, second, I've sent off [a number of Ossetia pictures] to [the World Press Photo contest], so there is a reason to post it all here.


In his posts from Israel, however, Kostyukov does mention the previous conflict, noting how different it was working there and, yes, drawing some parallels, too. He also provides some general insight into the work of a war photographer. Below are three excerpts, translated from Russian.

Jan. 12, 2009:

[...]

A strange war... in the midst of civilization, in the midst of a wonderful world. As if it's happening in the middle of a fairy tale town. Does not resemble Ossetia at all. Here, they are transporting tanks to positions on trucks, driving on asphalt, because it's faster this way, of course. There's war here, and WiFi nearby, cozy restaurants and hotels. On a country road, a [self-propelled artillery vehicle] is re-positioning, and a farmer on tractor is watering something on a nearby field.

And the people are used to war, ready for it. Here, there are bomb shelters in every house, cafe, gas station. There are shelters along the road. Israelis know how to act correctly, which radio station to tune in to to learn about danger, they know where to run to...

[...]

In Gaza now there must be pure hell, I guess. Seeing how much of everything is falling there now, it's scary to imagine being there yourself. They are not letting [anyone] in and out of Gaza now. We have only one photographer there, I guess. He calls us and you can hear by his voice that the pressure is growing. A missile hit the building next to our Gaza office.

On the Israeli side, all the journalists stand on two or three hills from which one can see well the areas under fire. [...]

The main difficulty is that journalists aren't allowed to work with the army. [...] Soldiers don't care whether anyone is photographing them or not, it's the military police that's taking care of that, and they are asleep until 8 AM. That's why everyone is gathering pictures to last them the whole day from 6 AM to 8 AM, and then they get their long-range lenses out and observe the bombings.

I guess in this war I am in a position of those journalists who were in Georgia on the [Gori] side - everything is closed off [...].


Jan. 17, 2009:

[...] The most disgusting thing is that the editors keep calling, saying things like, "Hey, what are you doing over there? Find us a soldier with a flag standing next to a tank!" Damn, there's nothing like that here! There are some people, but it's a huge territory, the army is moving, and we don't have the right to be here at all. [...]

But today we've met this couple. They live right next to the border. The guy said right away that he was ultra-right. He said the following... All that our army is doing here, it's all [really lightweight]. We kill 1,000 - that's very little. They give birth to 500 children in one night. Forty thousand should be killed. [...] We should invite Mr. Putin over. Hire him and pay him 2 million a day. And it wouldn't be too much of an expense. He'll quickly do what needs to be done. And we'll be able to leave peacefully for the next 20 years or so.

I'm not going to talk about how 'slightly' surprised I was. Of course, there are enough fools everywhere, but how come Putin has become the reference point for the ultra-right? I'm not an expert in the history of the Jewish people, but I suspect that many Jews fled to Israel from the Soviet regime, the repressions, etc. And now there are people in their country who are saying things like this?

Lately, I've been hearing about Russia in the following context, more or less: you journalists are always lying, but tell us, why the U.S. [is allowed to do what it's doing] in Iraq and Afghanistan, why Russia [is allowed to do what it's doing] in Georgia and Chechnya - while we aren't allowed? I hear this "why Russia is allowed" more and more often in all kinds of places. Not just here.

Soldiers and ordinary civilians are often asking: "Why are you lying? Why are you showing Israel from such a negative perspective? What have we done to you? Why aren't you saying the truth?" God, in such moments I just don't know what to say, because we always hear stuff like this.

In Gaza I'd be told the same thing. Why are they killing us? Why are you talking so little about it? [...]

In Ossetia, though, it hurt especially badly. We were doing all we could. Dozens of photos every day - tears, dead people, ruined houses, constant commentary... not many journalists were doing this. And still, I was always hearing that we were shit.

We returned and my friends started saying that I didn't do my job well. That, like, it's hard to understand what we were doing there when the whole world thinks that Russia started it first. Why weren't we showing how terrible Georgia was.

Later, I was in Gori and people there were jumping on us again, saying: Why are you lying? Why aren't you showing how tough it is for us? Why aren't you saying how terrible Russia is? A crowd of women started showing the traces of a missile blast to me. They started asking me to take a picture of it. I lost control and said that they hadn't seen Tskhinval and what it was like there now. I think it's easy for you to imagine what and how they responded to me. It's good that there were soldiers nearby.

Perhaps there are professions that are always drawing harsh words and yet everyone continues to use those services. Doctors, the police, teachers, politicians, journalists. And there are reasons to be saying harsh words, of course, but it's also clear that in these professions there are always situations when it's very easy to make a mistake. And sooner or later everyone makes a mistake. But this does not justify us, perhaps. [...]


Jan. 19, 2009:

We got nearly shot to death today. Now I have this strange feeling. Keep thinking that a few more seconds and that would've been it... More often than not, journalists do get killed in silly ways. We didn't notice a camouflaged checkpoint, and we stopped only when the safety lock was off and the gun was a few meters away from our heads. Strange, but in a situation like this, all you see are the eyes [of the person about to shoot]. I don't know about myself, but my colleague [...] turned white as a sheet in one second. In Georgia, a TASS photographer [Aleksandr Klimchuk] was killed in such an absurd way - he replied 'Gamarjoba' ['hello' in Georgian] [...] to a greeting of the Ossetians. And with me, it's like nothing special has really happened, but in about ten minutes I was shaking so much inside as if I'd drunk ten cups of coffee.


Kostyukov's photos of the Israeli troops' pullout are here and here.

Russia: Lawyer Markelov and Journalist Baburova Shot Dead in Moscow

Global Voices Online
Tuesday, January 20, 2009


Russian human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov, 34, was shot to death Jan. 19 as he walked from a news conference along Prechistenka Street in central Moscow. Journalist Anastasia Baburova, 25, who accompanied Markelov, was also shot as she tried to intervene; she died in hospital a few hours later.

Baburova was a freelance journalist for Novaya Gazeta.

Markelov was the attorney for the family of Elza (Kheda) Kungaeva, an 18-year-old Chechen woman killed by Russian colonel Yuri Budanov in March 2000. Budanov was granted early parole and released from prison on Jan. 15, 2009. At the Jan. 19 news conference, Markelov said he planned to file an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against Budanov's early release.

Markelov's other high-profile client was journalist Mikhail Beketov, who was attacked and severely beaten in Nov. 2008 (see this Chicago Tribune story for more info).

The New York Times quoted a spokeswoman for Novaya Gazeta, who said that Markelov had also worked on "almost every case opened as a result of the work of Anna Politkovskaya," a prominent Russian journalist who was shot dead in Oct. 2006.

Many Russian bloggers reacted with shock and outrage to the broad-daylight shootings of Markelov and Baburova. Below are some of the initial responses, translated from Russian.

LJ user tupikin:

[...] I've known Stas [Stanislav] for God knows how many years, from the early 1990s perhaps, from the time he was a law student. Then he finished his studies, cut his long hair short and became a lawyers who was defending the truth, defending human rights even when it seemed that it was impossible to defend them.

He worked in Chechnya against the federals, he worked against the police, he worked against the Nazis.

And he, damn it, was an incredibly cheerful and optimistic person, despite all these nightmares that accompanied him in life. [...]


LJ user alisezus:

I've no idea who killed Stas and Anastasia Baburova. Whoever it was - may he be damned.

Stas used to offer a helping hand to the most humiliated, the most insignificant and, often, the most despised people - those who could no longer hope to get any qualified legal assistance.

A few times I gave Stas' number to my own friends. He never refused to help. Haven't lost a single case.

Eternal memory to you.


LJ user oleg-shein:

[...] Markelov worked on a huge number of cases, which, as a rule, had something to do with illegal activities of the officials. We met when protesters were beaten up in [Elista] five years ago and one person died. We succeeded in replacing the prosecutor then and halting prosecution against those who participated in the protest. There there many other episodes. [...]

He was a sincere, brave and very compassionate person, who had a good sense of irony and sarcasm, a true menace to those who were used to humiliating ordinary people with impunity.


LJ user xanzhar:

[Lawyer Yuri Shmidt] writes that [Markelov] was too brave. Careless. Maybe he did not completely understand what country he lived in. And we, too, did not understand it completely. How disgusting...


One of the comments to this post, from LJ user aquim:

He understood everything. Namely, that a real war is taking place in the country. He knew that he was taking risks all the time.


LJ user marchenk:

[...] Stas was known and respected by everyone who was involved in some kind of social activism. Not just in Moscow. Hard to believe.

He is survived by wife and two children. [...]


A couple comments to this post:

andrei_naliotov:

I talked to him on Thursday. He was convinced that Budanov did not deserve [early conditional release]. To the question on what's to be done now he replied: "We'll fight." An anti-fascist. Beketov's lawyer. [...]

marchenk:

[...] Stas belonged with human rights activists, trade unionists, anarchists, anti-fascists, those who advocated the rights of migrants and refugees. He was perceived not just as a lawyer [...] but as an activist as well. [...]

[...] Throughout his involvement in law and activism, he had been getting many different threats. Budanov's case, Beketov's case, the European Court of Human Rights cases, support for anti-fascists...


LJ user smitrich:

[...] It resembles the murder of Politkovskaya too much.


LJ user voinodel, in a comment to this post:

No, Dima, this murder is much worse.


LJ user voinodel - and his readers - in the comment section to a post on his own blog:

ogneva007:

I think this is part of a script, and the early conditional release of the defendant is, too. The goal is to provoke a social collapse.

voinodel:

Would be okay if it was so. But this seems to be no longer a professional theater, but an amateur performance.

ogneva007:

Amateur performance is predictable and provokable, too.

voinodel:

Yes, you've understood me correctly. But [amateur performance] is scarier because it is taking place on a larger scale.

ogneva007:

And the scale is frightening - I read LJ a lot. And I'm shocked that it is possible to screw (pardon) normal people's brains so much that they begin to write really delirious things with foam at their mouths.

[...]

maramaram:

Markelov, as we know, was Mikhail Beketov's lawyer, but nothing but Budanov is being discussed. I think that those who Beketov was [fighting against] could have predicted such a "course of public thought."

voinodel:

[...] As for Beketov, I absolutely agree with you. But this has to do with us journalists. People will read more eagerly about the murder of the lawyer of the Kungaevs than about the murder of the lawyer of "some" Beketov.


***

A few links to English-language posts on the double murder:

- Keith Gessen Blog:

[...] I’ve been watching TV since I got home… and it’s amazing. It’s amazing. The most offensive, most propagandistic of the evening news shows is on Channel 3, TV-Center, it’s not a major channel so they try harder—the woman broadcaster acted like it was Markelov’s fault that he got shot on the night she was hosting the news. “Another of those killings that are said to ‘resonate,’” she began contemptuously before reading the details as quickly as possible—as though, ok, she understood it was “news,” but also she knew this was all part of Markelov’s brilliant marketing strategy, his media campaign, and, frankly, she found it in poor taste.

There was no hint of an idea that Putin or Medvedev would respond, or that people would grieve, or that something really really horrible had just happened, that they were killing all the best people in Russia and no one was going to do anything about it. [...]


- Ongoing coverage at Robert Amsterdam's Blog, which includes Grigory Pasko's report; a post on the earlier threats that Markelov received; updates on the media and advocacy groups' reactions; and a post on Budanov's early release, drafted when Markelov was still alive.

Latvia: Rioting in Riga

Global Voices Online
Saturday, January 17, 2009


In his post about the Jan. 13 peaceful anti-government protest followed by rioting in Riga, Aleks Tapinsh of All About Latvia wrote that Ivars Godmanis, the Latvian PM, had "told the people in his New Year’s Eve address how penguins deal with severe winter - they huddle together to stay warm - the same way as Latvians ought to do when going through the economic turmoil."

What happened in Latvia's capital on Tuesday has thus been labeled by some as the "penguin revolution."

Below are some of the accounts and opinions from the blogosphere.

More from All About Latvia's post linked to above:

Shattered glass. Blue paint on the building. Broken plastic bottles. Cobblestones. Ninety-eight detained.

[...]

But it started all so peaceful. Around 5 p.m. several hundred people had already flooded the Dom Square in the heart of the capital of Latvia. People of different ages, ethnicity, backgrounds appeared united in their disdain for the ruling coalition, and – more importantly – the culture of political cynicism.

Following the 90-minute event mostly young people moved toward the Saeima building. They tried to get in. Prevented from doing so by the riot police, they began throwing anything that they could lay their hands on - from snowballs to street cobblestones. [...]


An English-language interview with a protester, conducted by Aleks Tapinsh, is here. The man believes that "new people" should be allowed into Latvia's politics for the country to prosper and talks about the effect that the ongoing crisis has so far had on his business.

A selection of relevant photo and video reports - at a Russian-language blog on the disturbances of Jan. 13: http://lvrevolucija.blogspot.com/.

Juris Kaža of Free Speech Emergency in Latvia offers this assessment:

[...] On one level, the ruling coalition in Latvia had this coming to it. Regardless of what the law and the book of etiquette says, a riot is a form of political struggle, though less focussed and clear than a well-defined non-violent protest. Seeing eggs and rocks fly at the Saeima building as a symbol of the ruling elite and Latvian politicians made not only me but many others feel that they had this coming.

If there is more severe repression against future protests, it will most likely escalate to the West European model of periodic clashes between the police and young streetfighters.

While this is unfortunate, especially for those suffering collateral damage -- looted stores, injured police and bystanders -- it now seems inevitable that street violence will become part of the political scene here and the threat of such violence -- a likely excuse for curbing non-violent expression. Post-Soviet authoritarian thinking in Latvia is strong, and it will not diminish but find some self-justification after the Riga riots.


A pre-protest roundup on the political and economic situation in Latvia - defaulted bank loans, corrupt politicians, legislative chaos - in earlier posts at All About Latvia, here and here.

Juris Kaža, in a Jan. 16 post, reports on the Riga City Council's decision "[to deny] permits for two politically-oriented gatherings in Riga's Old Town" on Saturday and Sunday:

[...] There are comments and appeals circulating on the internet asking people to defy the ban on gatherings in the Old Town and hinting at a repeat of the January 13 disorders if the police attempt to disperse or interfere with any unsanctioned public meetings. [...]


A reader, however, refutes the information about the banning of the rallies in this comment to Juris Kaža's post:

[...] Blanket ban of assembly in Old Town would, of course, be wrong and unlawful, and even ban on particular kind of gatherings would, I think. No such ban has been established, public comments of officials proposing to ban particular kind of gatherings notwithstanding. [...]


Riga-based LJ user xzirnisx posted several pictures and wrote this (RUS) the morning after the disturbances:

In all kinds of tourist booklets, they've always liked to call Riga the "small Paris." Last night, the city turned into a small Athens, and I'm incredibly happy about it, because I used to think that for our people, who are patiently enduring all the troubles and deprivations, there is nothing that can force them to drag their behinds off the couch. But, it turns out, there is something.

Naturally, the mass media are trying to turn everything into farce, emphasizing the fact that the "vandals have looted the Latvijas balzams (liquor) store," but for some reason failing to mention the [five dozen] injured protesters, faces of girls adorned with running mascara and bruises, and pensioners who've also got a taste of black rubber.

Over a hundred people are now huddling at [police] stations all over the city. Most of them are not vandals. I still can't get through to my brother. The PM said that "there'll be no more actions on the territory of the Old Riga." Here it is, the true face of our pseudo-democracy ;)


In response to a reader's question, LJ user xzirnisx listed some of the reasons (RUS) for the people's discontent:

[...] We currently have the highest unemployment rates in the EU. In December, some 300 people were losing jobs every day - this with the population of 2 million. Per capita GDP is the lowest in the EU (or [it's the lowest] in Polans, which places us on the second place from the end). And what are the measures that the government is taking? They are raising the VAT to 21 percent and cut [state employees'] salaries by 15 percent. In the private sector, salaries have also gone down - by about [a half] since October. In addition to all this, public transportation has become twice as expensive this year and costs Ls 0.50 ($1). They've also raised [natural] gas prices - and they are selling it to us at four times (!!!) the price that Russia is charging them for it. And the more expensive the gas, the more expensive the electricity and heating. [...]


Daugavpils-based LJ user aljena-beljaeva posted information (RUS) about a fundraising effort for Edgar Gorban, a 16-year-old protester who lost his eye during the rioting:

[...] They say the eye was hit either by a stone, or he lost it as a result of [tear] gas, but originally there was information about a rubber bullet. I don't know what really happened and I don't really care. One way or another, I saw this boy's crying mother on TV, an ordinary Russian-speaking woman, and I feel very sorry for her. Some people are now saying that we shouldn't be turning him into a romantic hero - he must have been throwing stones himself, so he is the one to blame. [...]


Riga-based LJ user kris_reid posted his policeman friend's account (RUS) of what had occurred on Jan. 13, addressing the entry to readers from Russia - who, according to the blogger, were likely to get the other side of the story - "the protester's version" - from "the zombie-box [Russian TV]":

[...]

"[...] When [...] the number of people returning from the rally decreased and we were expecting to hear "thank you for your work" over our walkie-talkies, we got information about groups gathering by the Saeima [Latvian parliament] [...]. And at 8 PM, a general alert was issued and an order came for all the free units and the reserves to go to certain points to get instructions. [...]

About the "non-use of special devices" - lies. I myself was among those who used them. Got caught on [some videos]. [Beat up] one guy [who was] five meters away and about to throw a stone, and handed him to [the riot police guys], who [beat him up some more] and led him away [...]. Him and his cocky [girlfriend]. I heard from colleagues that flash/noise and gas grenades were being used by the Saeima.

[...]

Upd. [Rioters] were multinational. There were enough of both [ethnic] Latvians and [ethnic] Russians.

Can't say anything about the rally - didn't see it [...]. People leaving the rally made a good impression - more or less normal people. The whole mess happened because of the predominantly marginal youth, most of them [drunk]. [...] And the disturbances were of a totally European scale - with ripped out cobblestone. [...]"

Israel: Construction Workers From Gaza

Global Voices Online
Monday, January 12, 2009


There's a myriad of posts on the war in Gaza in the Russophone blogosphere right now, with the whole spectrum of opinions well-represented by Israeli and non-Israeli bloggers alike.

The text (RUS) translated below, however, is not about the ongoing conflict. On Jan. 8, Tel Aviv-based LJ user leorer (Leonid Rabin) took a step aside and posted his notes on the six construction workers from Gaza he worked with in Ashdod for a year and a half in 1996-97 - "the first few years of [his] life in Israel":

[...]

All of them are [fathers with many children]. Aged 40 or older. To get an Israeli work permit, a Gazan has to have no fewer than five children (it was considered that in this case he'd be working honestly instead of fooling around). Speaking of the issue of [high] birth rates in Gaza - for some reason, we here tend to forget that we've been stimulating these birth rates ourselves, including through measures like this one.

[The head of the Gazan construction team] has been working in Israel for about 15 years. They say he has built nearly half of [Rishon LeZion]. Two of those [seven men] who were shot by the "Jewish hero" [Ami Popper on May 20, 1990] used to work along with him. He was lucky himself: he got sick that day and didn't go to work, or else he would have been there, too.

As a child, he escaped from [Ashkelon] (which was called Majdal then). He said his parents owned a lot of land there and were respected people. Then, of course, there was a refugee camp, but he managed to get ahead there and ended up becoming [head of a construction team].

The second Gazan "old-timer" was the father of 12 children (that's more than the rest of them had), nicknamed [Ya-Hmar]. He got this nickname because he owned the best stud donkey in Gaza. Everyone took their female donkeys to him. But the income from that wasn't enough, so he worked at construction in Israel. While working, he yelled "yalla-yalla" every two minutes, urging everyone on, and his voice could be heard in all the neighboring blocks.

To my question of whether it was difficult to be raising 12 children, he once replied: "The more of them, the easier. They split into two teams and play football, are busy with each other all the time, don't bother us."

[...]

This whole bunch lived somewhere around [Khan Yunis].

Now about a typical working day of these [Ivan Denisovichs].

Its most important feature was the passing of the Erez [machsom] (a checkpoint on the way into Israel). The machsom opened at 4 AM, and closed at 5 or 6 PM. That meant that at 5 AM, one had to be at the machsom, because passing through it took no less than an hour.

So, they wake up at around 3 AM. At 4 AM, they get into the car of the [team's head] à la a "big taxi" and ride to machsom. The ride takes no less than an hour, because inside the [Gaza Strip] there are also Israeli checkpoints where they stop you. Near the Erez machsom, they leave their car - they can't ride into Israel in it. Around 5:30 AM, if they are lucky, they pass through the machsom and get into an Israeli bus. These special route buses were taking Gazans from Erez all the way to Tel Aviv. Their drivers were also Gazans, but only especially trusted. Around 6 AM, the bus passed the "Ad Galom" intersection, the Gazans got out and walked to the construction site.

They had some three kilometers to walk. Along the way they [took some booty] - snatched clothes hanging out to dry, found women's footwear somewhere, a few times they dragged children's bikes to the construction site. To my question about how they managed to get the stolen goods through the machsom into Gaza, they said it was very easy. On the way back, no one was checking them, but it was impossible to bring a screw into Israel, as everyone was searched and undressed almost to the underwear.

Work began at 7:30 AM, and the Gazans had about an hour and a half to spare before that. Enough to gather whatever had been misplaced in the neighboring blocks as well as to make fire and have breakfast.

Entry into Gaza closed at 5 PM (and at 1 PM on Fridays), so they had to leave work no later than 3 PM, otherwise they would miss their bus. Those who didn't get registered on entrance and on exit, in the morning and in the evening, were losing their right to enter Israel. If you missed a bus, take a taxi or whatever, but at 5 PM you have to be in the [Gaza Strip].

From the Erez machsom they could ride home in the same car. At best, they were home at 6 PM. They ate dinner, prayed, and it was time for bed. Tomorrow, they had to wake up at 3 in the morning.

By the way, they say some Gazans didn't go home from Erez but slept right at the machsom on [the Gaza Strip] side, [...] on the mattresses. They were saving time and energy this way. But not our guys - they were decent people, had to hug the wife and say hello to children.

About prayer, by the way. Prayer is sacred. A prayer rug was always with them, if not - any other would do. When the time came, every Gazan prayed regardless of where he was - at the construction site, at the machsom, on the road. The [head of the team] was the most religious.

In eight hours, a Gazan had [to do as much work] as everyone else did in ten hours, because if he failed to, [...] it was more profitable to hire Romanians or any other gastarbeiter, who could work 10 or even 12 hours, could work overtime if necessary, and didn't have to get registered in the morning and in the evening at the machsom. And indeed, in these eight hours, a Gazan did as much as a Romanian did in 12 hours. All that after the way "there" and before the way "back" described above.

I and most other non-Gazans would break down after a week of such a schedule, but our Gazans lived like this for decades. Up until the day the [Gaza Strip] was shut down once and for all, and the life of people there grew even worse. [...] Having seen all this, I understood even then that it was impossible to defeat these people or break them down. They can either be eliminated, or we can learn to live together with them. There are no other options.