Showing posts with label [radulova]. Show all posts
Showing posts with label [radulova]. Show all posts

Russia: International Women's Day

Global Voices Online
Sunday, March 11, 2007


            
                       
                         .
.                         .
                           .
.                         .
                         .
    .                 
            
    .                 
                         .
.                         .
                           .
                           .
.                         .    
                       .
    .                 
            

International Women's Day - by LJ user ljpost

March 8 happened to be the first really warm and sunny day in Moscow this year, and although crowds were out celebrating the International Women's Day, this didn't silence the Russian blogosphere at all.

LJ user ljpost, whose beer-drinking smiley creation is reproduced above, has also posted a March 8 male joke (RUS):

[She]: Darling, have you bought a March 8 present for me?
[He]: Of course, my dear.
[She]: Is it something that I'll like?
[He]: If you don't, you can give it to me: I've been dreaming about a spinning rod like this for a long time.


Joking (but not beer) aside, LJ user galerist - a well-known Russian gallery owner Marat Guelman - takes a moment to greet his mother, wife and daughter (RUS):

For me, it's not the "International Women's Day" - but the day of mama, Yulia and Eva.

If I've achieved anything, for example, it's only because I wanted to prove my "specialness" to Yulia. That is, she is my motivation. That I didn't screw it all up, in my meanderings, is also her achievement.

My mama, who is now with me always (thanks to LJ) - she may understand little of my life, but her emotions are my energy.

My dear little daughter makes me stay young and easily puts me into a state of idiotic delight several times a day. [...]


In the next post, galerist discloses (RUS) the kind of drink he was celebrating with:

We had hemp beer for the holiday dinner today. Maybe it's my imagination, but it somehow got me feeling super super well.


Russian journalist Natalya Radulova (LJ user radulova) adopts Marat Guelman's approach and writes about her beloved female relatives - but in her post (RUS), there's enough material for a few short stories:

Thank you

I suggest we all write about the women who played some role in our life and in the life of our country. Let it be our little "thank you."

My grandmother Manya (Maria, but this is how we called her). She was born in Tambov region. During the war, soldiers were passing through their village and she sliced the freshly-baked bread and ran to offer it to them. She gave each one a piece, except for one young soldier - and he started crying. So my grandmother went back and brought him the last piece that remained: the heel of the loaf [krayushechka]. She married Pavel, a disabled war veteran, who had been wounded near Leningrad, during an attack to end the Siege. She bore five children.

Grandmother Marusya (also Maria, but for some reason Marusya for short :) When I was little, I used to call her "baba Musya). Her first husband was killed during the war. Her second marriage was with Ivan, a disabled war vet as well. She had four children, one of whom is my papa, Victor. Grandfather had an open wound, which for some reason would not heal, and most of my memories are of my grandmother constantly washing blood-soaked bandages. Grapes and tulips grew in her backyard. Her birthday is March 8.

Galina. My grandfather's sister. She fought in the war. A Hero of the Soviet Union. I know very little about her.

Another Galina. My friend's grandmother [not related to her by blood]. During the war, the Germans gathered the Jews of Odessa and were taking them to be shot. Russian and Ukrainian women were whispering from the archways: "Throw the child!.. [RUS - Brosay rebyonka] Throw the child! [UKR - Kyday dytynu]" And one Jewish woman did just that - she threw her daughter into the hands of a stranger. Galina raised the girl, and then after the war her mother was found - she had survived. But Galya has forever remained part of this family.

Tatyana, my mama. A teacher. Her first child died right after birth, unfortunately. Then I was born, and my brother. My mama still works at school with my papa.


Finally, although March 8 was a day off for many in Russia, some - including riot police at Moscow's Pushkin Square - had to work relatively hard that day. And a tiny rally against Russia's involvement in Chechnya gained some prominence that day, due to the police and media presence - and, above all, thanks to a counter-rally held by a group of activists of Rossiya Molodaya ("Young Russia"), a youth movement that may be labeled as an anti-opposition opposition group.

Some in the anti-war group (no more than two dozen people) were there to also mark the second anniversary of Aslan Maskhadov's death (two years ago, on March 8, 2005, the dead body of the Chechen separatist leader was on every Russian TV channel, and Ramzan Kadyrov, then Chechnya's deputy prime minister, now the president, announced that this was his March 8 present to every Chechen woman).

"Aslan Maskhadov is not a terrorist, but a slain president of the Chechen Republic," was one of the slogans at the rally this year.

Rossiya Molodaya activists stood nearby holding a banner with this slogan on it: "It's better to congratulate women than commemorate a corpse."

Then, all of a sudden, a young man ran towards the blue toilet booths installed nearby, climbed them and began throwing leaflets from the roof in the direction of the anti-war protesters, chanting the same slogan over and over again, until the police succeeded in bringing him down.

LJ user principiale posted photos of the incident in the ru_politics LJ community and provided a link to this YouTube video, produced by Rossiya Molodaya and viewed 3,078 times so far:

Russia: Abortion Politics

Global Voices Online
Friday, December 1, 2006


In response to the grim economic situation, abortion was made legal in the Soviet Union in 1920. From 1936 to 1955 - under Joseph Stalin and until after his death - abortion was outlawed. In today's Russia, according to some data, abortions outnumber live births; for many women, abortion is still the primary method of birth control.

A Wikipedia article on the Russian demographics cites a 2005 Moscow News story on abortion - namely, the figures provided by Vladimir Kulakov, vice president of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences: "About 1.6 million women had an abortion last year [in 2004], a fifth of them under the age of 18, and about 1.5 million gave birth [...]. “Many more” abortions weren’t reported."

A few weeks ago, two Russian lawmakers (Aleksandr Krutov and Nikolay Leonov of the Rodina political faction) proposed a law (RUS) that would require spousal consent before a married woman can have an abortion. The Russian blogosphere's response to the news was, quite predictably, overwhelming. Below is just a fraction of reactions, translated from Russian.

A discussion hosted by LJ user anastasija-kara:

It's outrageous.

Lawmakers have reacted to the president's call to increase birth rates in the country: a bill has been proposed at the State Duma that would make it illegal for a married woman to have an abortion without her husband's consent.

This is violation of women's rights, and I personally would come out to rally against this law in case they pass it. And along with me, real_whitecoffe will come out, and, I think, we won't be the only ones.

Men, what do you have to say?

---

[...]

kinoersh: If one considers it a reaction to the president's call to improve birth rates, that it is indeed outrageous. And extremely silly.

anastasija_kara: [...] But in general, do you think that it's the man who gets the last word?

kinoersh: The child is supposed to get it. Only who's gonna give it to him.

Listen, I can't come to an agreement with myself on the issue of abortion. And I wrote what's obvious. The last word here isn't with the man, of course. But still... who the hell knows...

[...]

vvp_fuck: Just another idiocy. Though I've known it for a long time that there are only fascists and sexists in the Duma, so it's not surprising. Soon they'll prohibit women from getting an education, to make them have more children. Bastards...

But actually, could someone explain to me why the hell there should be higher birth rates? No one's gonna live on the fringes, and Moscow and St. Pete are overcrowded anyway... If you ask me, the fewer the people, the more oxygen. There are enough of workers, and there'll be enough of qualified professionals once they cancel the draft... Or do they want our girls to give birth to more soldiers for them??? If they raise birth rates, we'll have unemployment in 20 years and overpopulation like in China in 50 years.

My opinion is that birth is such a natural process that NO ONE should have the right to regulate it, and especially not the president who, I'm sure, doesn't give a damn about my family and whether my kids would starve or not, etc.

Well, and the right to decide to have an abortion belongs to the woman - because she has to carry and give birth to the child, and if the husband really wants the child so badly, let him discuss it all with his wife in advance...

[...]

skotic: It has nothing to do with increasing birth rates, obviously. No one's ever going to keep the woman from getting divorced and then having an abortion. I understand it correctly, don't I: they are talking about a "husband" - not a "biological father"? If this is so, then this bill has nothing whatsoever to do with common sense. [...]

anastasija_kara: While the woman is getting divorced with her husband, the term during which she can have an abortion will be up.

[...]

arnaut_katalan: To every supporter of abortion - a free euthanasia as a gift!

nadkathegreat: To every opponent - a child from an orphanage to bring up.

[...]

inelgerdis: To give birth or not. It's important, but there's another significant aspect that makes me mad more than others. Yet again, they are trying to solve an important problem by following the simplest [...] path - the path of bans and restrictions.

Take the kids' financial aid as an example. Hello, you, those who are arguing here, do you remember how much we receive? A friend of mine, for instance, became a widowlast year, with a 10-year-old daughter to raise. And how much money do you think she was given? Bear in mind that it's he pension given due to "the loss of a bread-winner" - no less. Slightly more than 2,000 rubles ($75) a month. Is that serious?

And so instead of working on implementation of such truly important things as normal aid, benefits, [...], etc. - all that would be helpful to mothers - this imbecile just proposes a ban. [...] It's easier to ban [...]. And those long-term mother-and-child programs - they are tiresome.

If the social sector was developed normally here, there wouldn't be reasons to have abortions. There won't be as many of them, that is. So few that such disgusting bills wouldn't be able to reach the surface.

[...]

boozsel: The Middle Ages. [...] I'm for women and their rights because I myself would be scared to give birth [...].

[...]


Another discussion at journalist Natalya Radulova's blog (LJ user radulova):

vasinamama: I "admire" our State Duma. Uneducated, irresponsible, cynical - but so proactive.

radulova: We have what we've elected.

vasinamama: Something's telling me that you didn't vote for Rodina. Nor did I. The cruel laws of democracy are working against us.

darlya: Our votes - do they have influence on anything? Don't make me laugh.
а разве наши голоса на что-то влияют? не смешите.

[...]

ximerka: The only thing they'd increase this way would be the number of illegal abortions.

prosto_alyssa: And the number of divorces!

prosto_alyssa: I wonder - and what if the husband wants his wife to have an abortion - would they be forcing her to?

[...]


LJ user mar-palna's blog:

rushana: They'll never adopt it. Like the Middle Ages, really. Though, of course, it's easier to ban abortions than pay normal salaries and give apartments to new families.

[...]


***

LJ community ru_politics, LJ user zebra24:

[Inspired by] by the latest news [...], I propose a national project of fighting fools.

We can start with the Duma - with PM Krutov, for example: I propose to castrate him. It won't, of course, solve the problem of fools right away, but at least we can expect that in the next generation, there'll be fewer fools.

The advantages are obvious and expenses minimal, and though the problem with human rights remains, PM Krutov knows nothing about [human rights], so it'll be a shame if we don't use it.

And in general, since our Duma isn't a place for discussions, I propose to castrate legislators for the silly things they say. It'll be especially relevant for [LDPR] and Rodina factions, but the [United Russia] won't be left too far behind.

By the way, there's one more option - not to elect [politicians] like that anymore, but I'm afraid that since our democracy is so very sovereign, the Kremlin's "democrats" aren't going to ask us who to elect and who not to elect.

---

perceptron: But the essence of Krutov's proposal is such that if you use it with your proposal, it'll turn out that it's only be possible to castrate him with his wife's permission.

vasimv: It's okay. We'll hold a referendum. They've cancelled the minimal turnout requirement, so if you alone show up - there's a chance [for the vote to be considered legitimate] :)

[...]